From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Scmidt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 2, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-0521 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-0521 CKD P

09-02-2015

JESSE PEREZ, III, Plaintiff, v. L. SCMIDT, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 23) is denied. Dated: September 2, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
pere0521.31


Summaries of

Perez v. Scmidt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 2, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-0521 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Perez v. Scmidt

Case Details

Full title:JESSE PEREZ, III, Plaintiff, v. L. SCMIDT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 2, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-0521 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2015)