From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Millard Fillmore Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 9, 1999
263 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

July 9, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J. — Bifurcate Trial.

PRESENT: DENMAN, P. J., LAWTON, HURLBUTT, SCUDDER AND BALIO, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: In this action seeking to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff when she fell on defendant's premises, Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion to bifurcate the trial ( see, Loncz v. Blagrove, 254 A.D.2d 735). "`As a general rule, issues of liability and damages in a negligence action are distinct and severable issues which should be tried and determined separately'" ( Loncz v. Blagrove, supra, quoting Martinez v. Town of Babylon, 191 A.D.2d 483, 484; see, 22 NYCRR 202.42 [a]). Defendant failed to establish the need to depart from that general rule ( see, Loncz v. Blagrove, supra; Johnson v. City of New York, 191 A.D.2d 216).


Summaries of

Perez v. Millard Fillmore Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 9, 1999
263 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Perez v. Millard Fillmore Hospital

Case Details

Full title:LETICIA PEREZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MILLARD FILLMORE HOSPITAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 9, 1999

Citations

263 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
704 N.Y.S.2d 525

Citing Cases

Guizzotti v. English

Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying the motion of defendant James Coyle and the cross…

Booker v. K-Mart Corp.

Findings of the Court While 22 NYCRR 202.42 (a) does not apply to the City Court of Buffalo ( see 22 NYCRR…