From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Hedgpeth

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 4, 2009
1:06-cv-0846 AWI DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2009)

Opinion

1:06-cv-0846 AWI DLB (HC).

March 4, 2009


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOCUMENT #61) SIXTY DAY DEADLINE


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On March 2, 2009, petitioner filed a motion to extend time to file objections to the findings and recommendations. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Petitioner is granted sixty days from the date of service of this order in which to file objections to the findings and recommendations.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Perez v. Hedgpeth

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 4, 2009
1:06-cv-0846 AWI DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Perez v. Hedgpeth

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT ANDREW PEREZ, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 4, 2009

Citations

1:06-cv-0846 AWI DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2009)

Citing Cases

Schatz v. Hatton

Moreover, petitioner does not sufficiently present any evidence of "egregious" or "extraordinary" misconduct…

Rigoni v. Hedgepath

         Counsel's alleged failure to inform petitioner of his right to appeal the restitution order does not…