From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Gasho of Japan, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 4, 2016
136 A.D.3d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

112 306126/11.

02-04-2016

Alyssa PEREZ, etc., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. GASHO OF JAPAN, INC., et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York (Beth S. Gereg of counsel), for appellant. Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, New York (Meredith Drucker Nolen of counsel), for respondents.


Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York (Beth S. Gereg of counsel), for appellant.

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, New York (Meredith Drucker Nolen of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered January 9, 2014, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal of the complaint was warranted in this action where plaintiffs allege that infant plaintiff tripped over a bump in a carpet runner in defendants' restaurant. The record shows that the subject defect was trivial and not actionable, where infant plaintiff's mother described the runner as being “bunched up ... a little,” with “a little lump” (see Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp., 26 N.Y.3d 66, 19 N.Y.S.3d 802, 41 N.E.3d 766 2015; Trincere v. County of Suffolk, 90 N.Y.2d 976, 665 N.Y.S.2d 615, 688 N.E.2d 489 1977; see also Kwitny v. Westchester Towers Owners Corp., 47 A.D.3d 495, 850 N.Y.S.2d 68 1st Dept.2008 ). There is no further detail in the record regarding the alleged defect.

Plaintiffs' remaining contentions are unavailing.

SAXE, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, RICHTER, FEINMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Perez v. Gasho of Japan, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 4, 2016
136 A.D.3d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Perez v. Gasho of Japan, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Alyssa Perez, etc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gasho of Japan, Inc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 4, 2016

Citations

136 A.D.3d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 753
23 N.Y.S.3d 883

Citing Cases

Schreer v. Kips Bay Dev. Ltd.

As shown by the Court in Hutchinson, a court's decision on these issues must be fact specific and based on…

Hinton v. Westbeth Corp.

Although there may be no proof of actual notice to the defendants, these individuals have raised an issue of…