From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Cnty. of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 1, 2024
CV 22-7696-SVW (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2024)

Opinion

CV 22-7696-SVW (AS)

07-01-2024

ZHOIE PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et, al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMNEDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

STEPHEN V. WILSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of a United States Magistrate Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. In sum, Defendants' Objections do not cause the Court to reconsider its decision to accept the Magistrate Judge's conclusions and recommendations.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the County Defendants' motion to strike Exhibits A through L from the Third Amended Complaint is GRANTED, and Exhibit M from the Third Amended Complaint is also stricken; (2) the County Defendants' motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: the official capacity claims against the Deputies and Doe Defendants are dismissed without leave to amend; Claims Three and Four and Plaintiff's Monell claims against the County are dismissed with leave to amend; and the motion to dismiss Claims One and Two is denied.

Plaintiff may file a Fourth Amended Complaint consistent with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is cautioned that any Amended Complaint must be complete in itself without reference to any prior complaint or any other document, and may not add any new claims or new defendants without prior leave of the Court.

If Plaintiff does not file a Fourth Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Claims Three and Four and Plaintiff's Monell claims against the County will be dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.


Summaries of

Perez v. Cnty. of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 1, 2024
CV 22-7696-SVW (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2024)
Case details for

Perez v. Cnty. of L. A.

Case Details

Full title:ZHOIE PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et, al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 1, 2024

Citations

CV 22-7696-SVW (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2024)

Citing Cases

Greathouse v. City of Fresno

See Kassab v. San Diego Police Dep 't, 453 Fed.Appx. 747, 748 (9th Cir. 2011) (finding genuine issue of…