From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perdum v. Michael

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 1993
193 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 11, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce McM. Wright, J.).


We agree with the IAS Court that petitioner failed to comply with the service requirements of CPLR 403 (b) and 7804 (c). Although petitioner sought to commence this action by order to show cause rather than by notice of petition (CPLR 304), he still was required to serve the petition upon respondent along with the order to show cause (Matter of Long Is. Citizens Campaign v County of Nassau, 165 A.D.2d 52). His service upon counsel only was jurisdictionally defective. Further, we note that the proceeding, even if properly commenced, would have been time-barred (CPLR 217).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Perdum v. Michael

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 1993
193 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Perdum v. Michael

Case Details

Full title:JEROME K. PERDUM, SR., Appellant, v. PHILIP R. MICHAEL, as Director of the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 11, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
597 N.Y.S.2d 326

Citing Cases

William Ct. v. Mental Retardation

) The provisions governing actions (CPLR former 304; former 305 [b]) required service of summons with notice…

Matter of 680 Rlty. Part. v. Comm., D., Fin

It is not disputed that, while the notice of petition was filed within the four-month limitations period, the…