From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perdue v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 7, 1922
92 So. 510 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)

Opinion

4 Div. 721.

February 7, 1922.

Appeal From Circuit Court, Crenshaw County; A.E. Gamble, Judge.

Hammond Perdue was convicted of having carnal knowledge of a girl under 16 years of age, and he appeals, Affirmed.

Ira B. Thompson, of Luverne, for appellant.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

The bill of exceptions was not presented within time, and cannot therefore be considered. There is no error in the record.


The defendant was convicted under an indictment which charged that he did carnally know or abuse in the attempt to carnally know a girl over the age of 12 and under the age of 16 years, and his punishment fixed by the jury at 2 years in the penitentiary.

It appears that judgment was rendered in this case on May 13, 1921, and that the bill of exception was approved on November 7, 1921. It does not appear when the bill of exceptions was presented. It not appearing that the bill of exceptions was presented in 90 days, the same cannot be considered.

We have examined the record and find no reversible error. The judgment of convictions is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Perdue v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 7, 1922
92 So. 510 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)
Case details for

Perdue v. State

Case Details

Full title:PERDUE v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Feb 7, 1922

Citations

92 So. 510 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)
18 Ala. App. 395

Citing Cases

Coleman v. State

The bill of exceptions was presented too late and must be stricken. Pippin v. Perry, 206 Ala. 582, 91 So.…