From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peralta v. Port of New York Authority

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jul 20, 1973
76 Misc. 2d 1086 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)

Opinion

July 20, 1973

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Queens, NAT H. HENTEL, J.

Patrick J. Falvey, Joseph Lesser, Arthur P. Berg and John J. Graubard for appellant.

Salvatore A. Mazzoni and Sydney Beizer for respondent.


Plaintiff, an employee of an airline, brings this action in contract of bailment and in negligence for damages sustained when her automobile disappeared from a parking lot made available at a cost for employees of airlines at the John F. Kennedy International Airport.

The stipulation of facts indicates, inter alia, that the method of operation of the lot was such that entry necessitated the insertion of a magnetic card into a slot of a machine but that exit through an unmanned gate did not.

While there was some measure of control by defendant over the lot it "operated and controlled," essentially, there was no such assumption of dominion and control as would create a bailment (see Ellish v. Airport Parking Co., 69 Misc.2d 837, affd. 42 A.D.2d 174). Nor was there proof of a negligent act or omission, in the facts as stipulated.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed.

Concur — GROAT, P.J., SCHWARTZWALD and MARGETT, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Peralta v. Port of New York Authority

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jul 20, 1973
76 Misc. 2d 1086 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)
Case details for

Peralta v. Port of New York Authority

Case Details

Full title:CECELIA PERALTA, Respondent, v. PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jul 20, 1973

Citations

76 Misc. 2d 1086 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)
351 N.Y.S.2d 787

Citing Cases

Sealey v. Meyers Parking Sys

Defendant further maintains that plaintiff must prove negligence against the defendant in order to recover…

Motors Ins v. Amer Garages

Thus in the so-called Airport parking cases, the parker is merely renting space; he is a type of temporary…