From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 16, 1984
68 Or. App. 385 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion


681 P.2d 179 (Or.App. 1984) 68 Or.App. 385 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Daniel Neal DIMMICK, Appellant. No. 83-2414-K; CA A30321. Court of Appeals of Oregon. May 16, 1984

       Submitted on Record and Briefs April 23, 1984.

       Brian E. Calvert and Calverts&sDavis, Grants Pass, filed the brief for appellant.

       Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., James E. Mountain, Jr., and Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

       Before GILLETTE, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, Judges.

       PER CURIAM.

       The state confesses error. Reversed and remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 16, 1984
68 Or. App. 385 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Case Details

Full title:PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 16, 1984

Citations

68 Or. App. 385 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)
68 Or. App. 385
681 P.2d 180

Citing Cases

Atkeson v. Cupp

This case involves 38 prisoners. See also Dee v. Cupp, 68 Or. App. 385, 680 P.2d 725 (1984) (17 prisoners)…