PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Full title: PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 23, 1981

50 Or. App. 616 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)

50 Or. App. 616

Opinion

623 P.2d 1140 (Or.App. 1981) 50 Or.App. 616 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. William Edward LEE, Appellant. No. C80-03-31017; CA 18516. Court of Appeals of Oregon. February 23, 1981

       Argued and Submitted Jan. 30, 1981.

       David E. Groom, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

       Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James M. Brown, Atty. Gen., John R. McCulloch, Jr., Sol. Gen., and William F. Gary, Deputy Sol. Gen., Salem.

       Before BUTTLER, P. J., and WARDEN and WARREN, JJ.

       PER CURIAM.

       The state properly concedes error. Reversed and remanded for trial.