From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Zerbst

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 26, 1989
74 N.Y.2d 888 (N.Y. 1989)

Opinion

Decided October 26, 1989

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Dan Lamont, J.

Michael J. Hutter for appellant.

Michael A. West, District Attorney, for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed for the reasons stated in so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division as concluded that the evidence adduced at trial from both victims was sufficient to corroborate the defendant's confession ( 147 A.D.2d 844, 845-846).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

People v. Zerbst

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 26, 1989
74 N.Y.2d 888 (N.Y. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Zerbst

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN DOUGLAS ZERBST…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 26, 1989

Citations

74 N.Y.2d 888 (N.Y. 1989)
547 N.Y.S.2d 843
547 N.E.2d 98

Citing Cases

People v. Sargent

Police Officer Ralph Peluso testified that defendant agreed to talk to him privately, was advised of his…

People v. Sanchez

Here, that corroboration "includ[ed] the defendant's own statements to the police" (id.; People v McIver, 15…