From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wurzler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 17, 1952
280 App. Div. 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

November 17, 1952.

Appeal from County Court of Broome County.


Defendant was sentenced as a second offender by reason of a previous conviction for the crime of robbery, second degree. Defendant contends on this appeal, that the testimony presented to the Grand Jury which indicted him "was known by the District Attorney to be perjured". There is nothing to support this charge except the bare allegation of defendant. This is not sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact long after sentence had been pronounced. Defendant appealed to the court before, alleging that the evidence before the Grand Jury was insufficient ( 278 App. Div. 608). Order affirmed. Foster, P.J., Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., taking no part.


Summaries of

People v. Wurzler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 17, 1952
280 App. Div. 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

People v. Wurzler

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM WURZLER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1952

Citations

280 App. Div. 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

Defendant's charge underscoring this motion in coram nobis designed to nullify the judgment of conviction…

People v. Nadile

The court is satisfied that the "new evidence" offered by defendant fails to create a question of fact to…