From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 10, 1994
209 A.D.2d 231 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 10, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Seewald, J.).


Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v. Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, cert denied 469 U.S. 932), we find that defendant's guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490).

Defendant's claim of prosecutorial misconduct during cross-examination and summation is without merit since the defendant opened the door to the prosecutor's cross-examination by challenging complainant's credibility (see, People v Johnson, 186 A.D.2d 356, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 763) and the comments made during summation were responsive to the defense arguments (see, People v. Halm, 81 N.Y.2d 819).

Finally, we find the trial court's charge on the elements of burglary in the second degree in this case was proper.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Kupferman, Asch and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 10, 1994
209 A.D.2d 231 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAYMOND WRIGHT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 231 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 1019

Citing Cases

People v. Bastian

In addition, contrary to defendant's contention, the prosecutor did not engage in misconduct by eliciting…