Opinion
November 6, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that he was prejudiced by the trial court's jury instructions is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245, 250), and, in any event, without merit. The jury charge, as given, adequately and properly instructed the jury on the elements of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (see, 2 CJI[NY] PL 165.40, at 1040A-1040E). Sullivan, J.P., Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.