Opinion
February 19, 1985
Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Martin, J.).
Judgments affirmed.
Not having raised the issue by motion to vacate or otherwise at nisi prius, defendant's argument that he should be relieved of his pleas of guilty has not been preserved for appellate review as a matter of law ( People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Pascale, 48 N.Y.2d 997; People v Warren, 47 N.Y.2d 740; People v Lawrence, 100 A.D.2d 944; People v Asep, 97 A.D.2d 798). Nor is reversal warranted in the interest of justice since the record clearly reveals that defendant's guilty pleas were knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made ( People v Modica, 100 A.D.2d 559, mod on other grounds 64 N.Y.2d 828).
We have reviewed defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Weinstein, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.