From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Woodard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 2004
11 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

KA 02-00220.

October 1, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Barry M. Donalty, J.), rendered December 19, 2001. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree (four counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

Before: Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of, inter alia, murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25), defendant contends that his conviction is not supported by legally sufficient evidence. Defendant's general motion to dismiss the indictment at the close of the People's case is insufficient to preserve that contention for our review ( see People v. Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19). In any event, we conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction ( see generally People v. Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant also failed to preserve for our review his contention that the People's expert usurped the function of the jury ( see CPL 470.05), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see CPL 470.15 [a]). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.


Summaries of

People v. Woodard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 2004
11 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Woodard

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BILLY WOODARD, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 2004

Citations

11 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
782 N.Y.S.2d 222

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

Moreover, as the evidence establishes that at the time defendant made his noncustodial statement the police…

People v. Sachs

ant to the issue of the identity of defendant as the perpetrator in order to establish that it was defendant,…