From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Winston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 1985
114 A.D.2d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

November 12, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Balbach, J.).


Judgments affirmed.

Defendant contends that the concurrent sentences of 1 1/2 to 3 years were excessive under the circumstances. However, the terms imposed were the minimum permitted by statute (Penal Law § 70.06 [e]; [4] [b]). In addition, since the sentence was in accordance with a negotiated plea agreed to by defendant, he could not, in any event, claim it to be excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). Mangano, J.P., Bracken, O'Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Winston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 1985
114 A.D.2d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Winston

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALLEN WINSTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1985

Citations

114 A.D.2d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Miller

Thereafter, at sentencing, the court imposed the promised increased sentence of 7 1/2 to 15 years…

People v. Lopez

The Court of Appeals has held that law enforcement officials are not entitled to restitution of "buy money"…