From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 14, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 2454 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)

Opinion

110533

04-14-2022

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ramel Williams, Appellant.

Edward S. Graves, Indian Lake, for appellant. J. Anthony Jordan, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Taylor R. Fitzsimmons of counsel), for respondent.


Calendar Date: March 18, 2022

Edward S. Graves, Indian Lake, for appellant.

J. Anthony Jordan, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Taylor R. Fitzsimmons of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Lynch, J.P., Reynolds Fitzgerald, Colangelo, Ceresia and Fisher, JJ.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J.), rendered June 15, 2018, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and waived his right to appeal. In accord with the plea agreement, County Court sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to a prison term of eight years, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant, contending that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we disagree. We find that there is at least one issue of arguable merit with respect to the validity of defendant's appeal waiver that may potentially impact other issues that may be raised, such as the severity of the sentence (see People v Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 565-566 [2019]; People v Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Derverger, 201 A.D.3d 1260, 1260 [2022]; People v Dye, 197 A.D.3d 1436, 1436 [2021]). Accordingly, without passing judgment on the ultimate merit of this issue, we grant counsel's application for leave to withdraw and assign new counsel to address this issue and any others that the record may disclose (see People v Beaty, 22 N.Y.3d 490, 492-493 [2014]; People v Stokes, 95 N.Y.2d 633, 638-639 [2001]; see generally People v Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 650 [1986]).

Lynch, J.P., Reynolds Fitzgerald, Colangelo, Ceresia and Fisher, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 14, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 2454 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ramel Williams…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 14, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 2454 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)