From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-10-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Spencer WILLIAMS, Defendant–Appellant.

Frank H. Hiscock Legal Aid Society, Syracuse (Piotr Banasiak of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse (James P. Maxwell of Counsel), for Respondent.


Frank H. Hiscock Legal Aid Society, Syracuse (Piotr Banasiak of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.

William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse (James P. Maxwell of Counsel), for Respondent.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his guilty plea of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20[1] ). Pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement, defendant entered his guilty plea in satisfaction of the indictment by which he was charged with, inter alia, murder in the second degree (§ 125.25[1] ), and County Court imposed a determinate term of incarceration of 25 years. During discussions over the plea offer, the court addressed the possibility of a jury convicting defendant of the lesser included offense of manslaughter in the first degree by stating: “[Y]ou wouldn't get any better than 25 [years] if you get a manslaughter. That's a big ‘if.’ ” Defendant contends that the court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea on the ground that it was coerced. We agree. “[T]he court's statements do not amount to a description of the range of potential sentences but, rather, they constitute impermissible coercion, rendering the plea involuntary and requiring its vacatur” (People v. Kelley, 114 A.D.3d 1229, 1230, 980 N.Y.S.2d 850 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v. Boyde, 122 A.D.3d 1302, 1302–1303, 995 N.Y.S.2d 428 ). In light of our decision, we do not address defendant's challenge to the severity of his sentence.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings on the indictment.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Spencer WILLIAMS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 10, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 1529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7450
41 N.Y.S.3d 638

Citing Cases

People v. Thigpen-Williams

We nevertheless exercise our power to review the contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of…

People v. Thigpen-Williams

We nevertheless exercise our power to review the contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of…