From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 4, 2016
139 A.D.3d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2012-06725, Ind. No. 11-01033.

05-04-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Demetrius A. WILLIAMS, appellant.

David J. Ortiz, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant. James A. McCarty, Acting District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Hae Jin Liu, Jennifer Spencer, and Laurie G. Sapakoff of counsel), for respondent.


David J. Ortiz, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

James A. McCarty, Acting District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Hae Jin Liu, Jennifer Spencer, and Laurie G. Sapakoff of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), rendered June 5, 2012, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We agree with the County Court that the prosecutor did not deprive the defendant of his right to testify before the grand jury, and thus, dismissal of the indictment was not warranted on this ground. The prosecutor provided defense counsel with at least five days' notice of his intention to present the case to the grand jury. Therefore, the defendant was accorded “a reasonable time to exercise his right to appear as a witness therein” (CPL 190.50[5] [a] ; see People v. Pugh, 207 A.D.2d 503, 615 N.Y.S.2d 912 ). We note that even if the defendant was out of state on the date of the grand jury presentation, his failure to appear was nevertheless of his own creation (see People v. Quinones, 280 A.D.2d 559, 560, 720 N.Y.S.2d 531 ).

The County Court did not err in allowing the introduction of evidence about a legal knife recovered from the seat compartment of the defendant's motorbike, and the defendant's admission that the knife was his. Such evidence was admitted to demonstrate the defendant's dominion and control over the seat compartment, and limiting instructions to the jury were provided in that regard (see People v. DeJesus, 240 A.D.2d 224, 658 N.Y.S.2d 310 ).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

LEVENTHAL, J.P., DICKERSON, COHEN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 4, 2016
139 A.D.3d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Demetrius A. WILLIAMS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 4, 2016

Citations

139 A.D.3d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
139 A.D.3d 766
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3540

Citing Cases

People v. Hines

In addition, the County Court did not err in denying the defendant's pretrial motion pursuant to CPL 210.20…