From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 2004
12 A.D.3d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4754

November 30, 2004.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J.), rendered July 17, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2½ to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Williams, Lerner, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The People established that defendant used physical force for the purpose of "[p]reventing or overcoming resistance . . . to the retention [of property] immediately after the taking" (Penal Law § 160.00). The evidence warrants the inference that defendant was not just fleeing, but was attempting to prevent a store employee from recovering the stolen goods that defendant had secreted in his jacket ( see People v. Safon, 166 AD2d 892, lv denied 76 NY2d 990).


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 2004
12 A.D.3d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAYMOND WILLIAMS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 30, 2004

Citations

12 A.D.3d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
784 N.Y.S.2d 867

Citing Cases

People v. Womack

In any event, defendant's challenges are without merit. We conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient…

People v. Womack

In any event, defendant's challenges are without merit. We conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient…