From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 10, 1994
204 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 10, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.).


Defendant's claim that the sentencing court sua sponte included in his plea bargain agreement a condition that defendant waive his right to appeal the determination of his pretrial motion is meritless. Defendant, after consulting with his father and defense counsel, acknowledged that he waived his constitutional rights, including the right to appeal the denial of his suppression motion (see, People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1).

In any event, the hearing court properly denied defendant's suppression motion upon crediting the officer's testimony that his grandmother gave them permission to enter her apartment.

We have considered defendant's other claims and find them meritless.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 10, 1994
204 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TYRONE WILLIAMS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 10, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 108

Citing Cases

People v. Johnson

sentence imposed was illegal, a claim that the defendant is not competent to stand trial, and a claim that…

People v. Johnson

eet the standard include the several issues traditionally enumerated in a valid appeal waiver colloquy, each…