From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 30, 1996
231 A.D.2d 751 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

September 30 1996.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), rendered June 13, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Altman and Luciano, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that because the prosecutor elicited his videotaped statement, the prosecutor should have been disqualified. The defendant, however, failed to demonstrate the necessity of the prosecutor's testimony, or that the prosecutor's pretrial activity was a material issue in the case ( see, People v Paperno, 54 NY2d 294). Accordingly, the court's ruling denying the defendant's motion to disqualify the prosecutor was proper ( see, People v Paperno, supra; People v Rufino, 198 AD2d 7; People v Wynn, 176 AD2d 443).


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 30, 1996
231 A.D.2d 751 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN WILLIAMS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1996

Citations

231 A.D.2d 751 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 124

Citing Cases

People v. Wilhelm

Contrary to defendant's argument, the prosecutor's testimony was not inconsistent with Duket's statement that…

People v. Fox

The defendant's motion is denied for the additional reason that he has not shown that the prosecutor will…