From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 2, 1997
245 A.D.2d 3 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 2, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.).


The court's Sandoval ruling was a proper exercise of discretion. Defendant was not entitled to be insulated from questioning as to his prior theft-related crimes simply because of his tendency to specialize in a specific type of crime ( see, People v. Post, 235 A.D.2d 299, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 862). The number of convictions as to which inquiry was permitted, representing only a third of defendant's criminal record, was not excessive ( see, People v. Rivera, 227 A.D.2d 205, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 993).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Tom, Mazzarelli and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 2, 1997
245 A.D.2d 3 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent v. MICHAEL WILLIAMS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 3 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 404