From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 2001
288 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2000-01127

Submitted October 31, 2001.

November 26, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), rendered December 13, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (George Grun of counsel), for appellant.

James M. Catterson, Jr., District Attorney, Riverhead, N Y (Patricia A. Murphy of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Mere eligibility for youthful offender status does not mandate youthful offender treatment. The decision to grant such treatment lies wholly within the discretion of the sentencing court (see, CPL 720.20; People v. Dodge, 260 A.D.2d 503; People v. Wallace, 246 A.D.2d 676). The sentencing court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant youthful offender status.

O'BRIEN, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY, SCHMIDT and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 2001
288 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. RODNEY WILLIAMS, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 887

Citing Cases

People v. Salco

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 83; see also CPL 720.20[a];…

People v. Brown

The waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses his further contention that the court erred in…