Opinion
June 23, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Kahn, J.).
Defendant was properly convicted of bail jumping in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.57). Defendant was originally released, prior to indictment. Upon his release, he was given an adjourned date and told to return. In the interim, an indictment was filed. When defendant failed to appear on the adjourned date, the court stayed a warrant and sent a letter advising defendant of the pending indictment and the next court date for his appearance. He failed to appear on that date and a warrant for his arrest was issued. He was indicted for bail jumping in the first degree based on this latter failure to appear. We conclude that Penal Law § 215.57 encompasses the circumstances here, notwithstanding that no indictment was yet pending at the time of the defendant's original release.
The court properly admitted "negative identification testimony" ( see, People v. Bolden, 58 N.Y.2d 741) concerning the undercover officers exoneration of a suspect whose attire was markedly similar to that of defendant. This testimony was relevant to the identification issues developed at trial ( see, People v. Rodriguez, 193 A.D.2d 633, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 1079; People v. Marrero, 156 A.D.2d 141, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 921).
Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Tom and Saxe, JJ.