From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wilcox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1989
147 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

February 21, 1989

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606).

The defendant's pro se claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel is based on matters which are dehors the record and thus is not reviewable on direct appeal. His appropriate remedy is a postconviction proceeding pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see, People v Candelaria, 139 A.D.2d 752). Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Wilcox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1989
147 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Wilcox

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEREMY WILCOX…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1989

Citations

147 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

People v. Jusino

In any event, we note that the complainant's statement, uttered less than a block from and only moments after…