From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Whyte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 8, 1998
254 A.D.2d 71 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 8, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Drager, J.).


Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People ( People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Defendant's intent to commit the burglary and his joint possession of a crowbar were established by testimony that he stood approximately five feet away, looking up and down the deserted street while his codefendant attempted to break into a restaurant with the crowbar, which was subsequently recovered a few feet away, that they consulted with one another several times during the course of the attempt, and that they both walked briskly away from the scene as the police approached ( see, People v. Wachowicz, 22 N.Y.2d 369; People v. Coulter, 240 A.D.2d 756, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 871).

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rubin, Tom and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Whyte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 8, 1998
254 A.D.2d 71 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Whyte

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EVERADO WHYTE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 8, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 71 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 200

Citing Cases

In re Luqman K

There is no basis upon which to disturb the court's determinations concerning credibility. The testimony of…