From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Whitley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2009
59 A.D.3d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

February 24, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Neary, J.), rendered November 14, 2007, convicting her of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and aggravated harassment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Eng, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court correctly permitted testimony as to statements identifying the defendant as the assailant, made by the complainant just minutes after she had been shot in the abdomen at close range, and while she was still in "excruciating pain," to be admitted into evidence as excited utterances ( see People v Johnson, 1 NY3d 302, 306; People v Fratello, 92 NY2d 565, 570; People v Cotto, 92 NY2d 68, 79; People v Brown, 70 NY2d 513, 519; People v Edwards, 47 NY2d 493, 497). The statements did not improperly bolster the complainant's testimony ( see People v Buie, 86 NY2d 501, 506; People v Caviness, 38 NY2d 227, 232; People v Coward, 292 AD2d 630; People v Masas, 244 AD2d 433; People v Farrell, 228 AD2d 693, 694).


Summaries of

People v. Whitley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2009
59 A.D.3d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Whitley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. AKILAH WHITLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2009

Citations

59 A.D.3d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
873 N.Y.S.2d 493

Citing Cases

People v. Fields

a hospital under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule. As the statements were made 10 minutes…

People v. Chin

In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit. If a proffered statement also meets the…