Opinion
May 9, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.).
On March 1, 1989, the defendant was observed by two plainclothes officers tugging at his right pants pocket, after which one of the officers saw the butt of a gun protruding from that same pocket. Defendant was arrested and read his Miranda rights. He voluntarily made statements on the way to the precinct house.
At a combined Mapp/Huntley hearing, a demonstration involving the defendant wearing his three-quarter length coat open while tugging at the unloaded gun supported the officers' testimony that they saw the gun butt or the recognizable outline of the gun. (People v Taveras, 155 A.D.2d 131, 135, appeal dismissed 76 N.Y.2d 871; People v Williams, 156 A.D.2d 288.)
Based on our review of the record, we find no basis to interfere with the hearing court's evaluation of credibility and findings of fact.
We have considered the other contentions raised and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.