From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Whipple

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 14, 1977
57 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

April 14, 1977


Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Essex County, rendered July 23, 1976, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree, a class C felony. On this appeal defendant raises two issues. As to defendant's first contention, that the trial court erred in not affirmatively advising him of his right to allocution, the record reveals that prior to sentencing the court gave both the District Attorney and the defendant's attorney an opportunity to speak and that both declined. The court then offered defendant a chance to speak, which defendant used to request that he be allowed to do "his time in Vermont". Thereupon the court imposed the sentence. The fact that the court did not again, after passing sentence, give the defendant or his attorney an opportunity to speak violates neither statutory nor case law (CPL 380.50; People v Bressette, 41 A.D.2d 781). As to defendant's contention that the sentence was excessive, we note the sentence imposed was considerably less than the maximum allowed by statute for a class C felony. Judgment affirmed. Greenblott, J.P., Kane, Mahoney, Main and Larkin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Whipple

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 14, 1977
57 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

People v. Whipple

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NEIL WHIPPLE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 14, 1977

Citations

57 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

People v. Perini

The defendant and his counsel were afforded an opportunity to speak before the sentence was imposed. The fact…