Opinion
No. 2022-00128
01-11-2023
The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Joseph P. Weeks, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 124/21)
Yasim Daley Duncan, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.
Yasim Daley Duncan, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.
William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.
MARK C. DILLON, J.P. LINDA CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM G. FORD JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Edward T. McLoughlin, J.), rendered December 10, 2021, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 340-342; People v Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256-257; People v Morrow, 198 A.D.3d 922, 923).
Although the defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent survives his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Cardona, 177 A.D.3d 647, 648), the defendant failed to preserve that contention for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw his plea or otherwise raise this issue before the County Court (see People v Peque, 22 N.Y.3d 168; People v Olmos, 199 A.D.3d 711). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant's plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 17).
The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d at 255).
DILLON, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, FORD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.