From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Watkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 9, 1996
226 A.D.2d 173 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 9, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Patricia Williams, J., Thomas Galligan, J.


The radio transmission of "shots fired", which accurately described defendant and his companion and their location, provided the police with, at least, a founded suspicion that criminal activity was afoot, permitting the police to exercise their common-law right of inquiry ( People v. Bora, 191 A.D.2d 384, affd 83 N.Y.2d 531; People v. Yates, 176 A.D.2d 442, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 834). Defendant's failure to comply with the officers' two requests to stop walking, followed by his flight, provided the police with reasonable suspicion justifying pursuit ( People v. Matienzo, 81 N.Y.2d 778, 780, citing People v. Martinez, 80 N.Y.2d 444, 448; People v. Bora, supra). Since defendant then put his hand to his waist while running, threw a heavy object under one of the buses where he hid, and refused to comply with the police command to lie on the ground, the police were justified in subduing and handcuffing defendant before frisking him in order to protect their safety and the safety of bystanders ( People v Foster, 85 N.Y.2d 1012, 1014, citing People v. Allen, 73 N.Y.2d 378, 379-380; People v. Chestnut, 51 N.Y.2d 14).

In light of defendant's extensive criminal history, the sentence was not excessive.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Watkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 9, 1996
226 A.D.2d 173 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Watkins

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PAUL WATKINS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 173 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
640 N.Y.S.2d 519

Citing Cases

People v. Wright

When the police responded to a burglary in progress at 5:30 A.M., and saw defendants, the only persons…

People v. Strickland

Before: Milonas, J.P., Nardelli, "Williams and Andrias, JJ. Defendant's suppression motion was properly…