From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1984
106 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

December 3, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The hearing court's finding that defendant made a statement to the police voluntarily, and knowingly waived his rights, is amply supported by the record. Therefore, suppression of the statement was properly denied ( People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759). Defendant's contention that he should have been granted youthful offender status is without merit. The grant of that relief lies within the discretion of the court ( People v. Williams, 78 A.D.2d 642). Defendant received the benefit of the plea bargain and received the sentence promised. Considering the seriousness of the crime and the relatively short sentence imposed, it was not an abuse of discretion to deny defendant the additional benefit of youthful offender treatment. Thompson, J.P., O'Connor, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1984
106 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Walsh

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEVEN WALSH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 1984

Citations

106 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Locke

The defendant's contention that Criminal Term abused its discretion in denying him youthful offender…

People v. Dor

The Second Department has found no abuse of discretion in less serious crimes involving much shorter…