From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Walls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 1980
74 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

March 3, 1980


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered March 14, 1978, convicting him, inter alia, of two counts of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of defendant's motion to suppress evidence. Judgment reversed, on the law, motion to suppress granted, plea of guilty vacated, and case remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings consistent herewith. While in custody following his arrest upon a felony complaint filed against him, and in the absence of counsel, defendant prior to interrogation waived his rights to counsel and to remain silent and made an incriminating statement to the police. This statement led to the finding of a gun used by defendant in the commission of the alleged crimes. An accused may not waive his right to the presence of counsel, absent counsel, after a felony complaint has been filed against him (People v Samuels, 49 N.Y.2d 218). Accordingly, notwithstanding defendant's willingness to speak with the police, his voluntary waiver of his rights, his incriminating statement and his guilty plea, we must reverse the judgment and suppress defendant's statement as well as the fruits thereof. Rabin, J.P., Cohalan, O'Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Walls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 1980
74 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

People v. Walls

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES WALLS, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1980

Citations

74 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

People v. Walls

However, at that time the defendant had already pleaded guilty in full satisfaction of the instant indictment…

People v. Peoples

Both of defendant's statements were read into evidence at his jury trial, following which he was convicted of…