From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Voight

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 16, 2000

Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Fahey, J. — Arson, 2nd Degree.

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., WISNER, HURLBUTT AND BALIO, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

On appeal from a judgment convicting her following a jury trial of arson in the second degree (Penal Law § 150.15), defendant contends that she was denied a fair trial by the introduction of evidence concerning a prior arson. The only such evidence was contained in a written statement that was made by defendant to the police and was received in evidence without objection during the People's case-in-chief. Defendant never moved to redact the reference to the prior arson from that statement, and thus defendant's contention is not preserved for our review ( see, CPL 470.05). Defendant's contention concerning the admissibility of rebuttal testimony also is not preserved for our review ( see, CPL 470.05). We decline to exercise our power to review those contentions as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see, CPL 470.15 [a]).


Summaries of

People v. Voight

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Voight

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHRISTINA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 16, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 410

Citing Cases

People v. Perkins

Because he failed to request redaction or object to admission of his statements on that basis, the issue is…