From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Viven

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1991
172 A.D.2d 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 22, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the County Court erred in summarily denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea on the ground that he and his codefendant had been represented by the same attorney at the plea and, as a consequence, he was denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel. We disagree. At arraignment, the County Court adequately ascertained, on the record, that the defendant was aware of the potential risks involved in joint representation and had knowingly chosen that course (see, People v. Cruz, 63 N.Y.2d 848, 849; People v. Gomberg, 38 N.Y.2d 307, 313-314). In any event, the defendant failed to demonstrate that a conflict of interest, or at least a significant possibility thereof, operated (see, People v. Recupero, 73 N.Y.2d 877).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Kunzeman and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Viven

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1991
172 A.D.2d 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Viven

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CESAR A. VIVEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)