Opinion
2013-11-26
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gustavo VINENT, Defendant–Appellant.
Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Emily L. Auletta of counsel), for respondent.
Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Emily L. Auletta of counsel), for respondent.
MAZZARELLI, J.P., ACOSTA, MOSKOWITZ, MANZANET–DANIELS, GISCHE, JJ.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered February 10, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of eight years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly declined to charge petit larceny as a lesser included offense since there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, that he stole merchandise, but did not use force to retain it. Nothing in the People's case supported such a theory ( see People v. Negron, 91 N.Y.2d 788, 676 N.Y.S.2d 520, 699 N.E.2d 32 [1998] ), and under the version of the incident presented in his own testimony, defendant did not commit any larceny at all, but was instead attempting to buy the merchandise ( see People v. Ruiz, 216 A.D.2d 63, 628 N.Y.S.2d 80 [1995], affd.87 N.Y.2d 1027, 644 N.Y.S.2d 137, 666 N.E.2d 1050 [1996] ). There was no rational basis for the jury to find that defendant stole the merchandise, but changed his mind and used force only to “return” it.
Defendant's legal sufficiency claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). The evidence established the element of physical injury ( see e.g. People v. Wise, 99 A.D.3d 584, 585, 952 N.Y.S.2d 196 [1st Dept.2012], lv. denied21 N.Y.3d 1011, 971 N.Y.S.2d 263, 993 N.E.2d 1287 [2013] ). In this regard, we find no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations with respect to the testimony of the victim and an eyewitness. The evidence supports the conclusion that the victim's injuries were more than mere “petty slaps, shoves, kicks and the like” (Matter of Philip A., 49 N.Y.2d 198, 200, 424 N.Y.S.2d 418, 400 N.E.2d 358 [1980] ), and that they caused “more than slight or trivial pain” (People v. Chiddick, 8 N.Y.3d 445, 447, 834 N.Y.S.2d 710, 866 N.E.2d 1039 [2007]; see also People v. Guidice, 83 N.Y.2d 630, 636, 612 N.Y.S.2d 350, 634 N.E.2d 951 [1994] ).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.