From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vidal

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 27, 2013
111 A.D.3d 967 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-27

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Luis VIDAL, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Thomas M. Ross, and Terrence F. Heller of counsel), for respondent.



Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Thomas M. Ross, and Terrence F. Heller of counsel), for respondent.
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J., THOMAS A. DICKERSON, L. PRISCILLA HALL, and LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ferdinand, J.), dated December 19, 2011, which denied his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon a jury verdict, on February 22, 1995.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46. The defendant was convicted of 2 felonies prior to the instant conviction, and incurred 16 disciplinary violations, including 8 Tier III infractions, while incarcerated. The defendant was convicted of two new crimes for acts committed while he was on parole for the instant conviction, and he again violated the terms and conditions of his parole after filing his motion to be resentenced. Under these circumstances, substantial justice dictated that his motion be denied ( see People v. Golo, 109 A.D.3d 623, 970 N.Y.S.2d 604; People v. Gutierrez, 109 A.D.3d 486, 970 N.Y.S.2d 85; People v. Browne, 107 A.D.3d 1013, 966 N.Y.S.2d 873; People v. Milland, 103 A.D.3d 669, 670, 958 N.Y.S.2d 507).


Summaries of

People v. Vidal

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 27, 2013
111 A.D.3d 967 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Vidal

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Luis VIDAL, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 27, 2013

Citations

111 A.D.3d 967 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
111 A.D.3d 967
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7996

Citing Cases

People v. George

ORDERED that the order is affirmed. Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not…

People v. Turner

ORDERED that the order is affirmed.Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court did not…