Opinion
424 KA 18-00856
08-20-2020
DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (SHIRLEY A. GORMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (SHIRLEY A. GORMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of two counts of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree ( Penal Law § 130.75 [1] [b] ), defendant contends that, although he validly waived his right to appeal, he may nevertheless seek a sentence reduction in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b] ). We reject that contention inasmuch as a valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses a challenge to the severity of the sentence and also "includes waiver of the right to invoke [this Court's] interest-of-justice jurisdiction to reduce the sentence" ( People v. Lopez , 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006] ).