From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vereen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 1977
57 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

May 12, 1977


Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on September 16, 1975, unanimously affirmed.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Evans and Lane, JJ., Birns and Capozzoli, JJ., concur in the following memorandum by Birns, J.: We note that the Trial Judge, despite the failure of defense counsel to request the charge, instructed the jury on the failure of the defendant to take the stand. The statutory language indicates that such charge is not to be given, absent request of the defendant (CPL 300.10, subd 2). However, courts that have considered this precise issue have declined to regard such a charge as prejudicial error. (See, e.g., People v Mulligan, 40 A.D.2d 165; cf. United States v Garguilo, 310 F.2d 249, 252; People v Garcia, 51 A.D.2d 329, affd 41 N.Y.2d 861, Fuchsberg, J., dissenting.) Although we have previously expressed dissent from such conclusion (People v Garcia, supra), nevertheless, we are constrained to vote for affirmance. (See, also, People v Britt, 52 A.D.2d 811, mot for lv to app granted.) Birns, J., dissenting.)


Summaries of

People v. Vereen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 1977
57 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

People v. Vereen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD VEREEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 12, 1977

Citations

57 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

People v. Yopp

Second, the court improperly limited the defendant's proof by failing to permit testimony from a correctional…

People v. Perez

However, we declared: "In a case where the guilt of a defendant was proven overwhelmingly, we might have…