From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Velez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2013
111 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-14

The People of the STATE of New York, Appellant, v. Raymond VELEZ, Defendant–Respondent.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Clara Salzberg of counsel), for appellant. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York (Layne S.R. Behrens of counsel), for respondent.


Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Clara Salzberg of counsel), for appellant. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York (Layne S.R. Behrens of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia Anne Williams, J.), entered on or about August 9, 2012, which dismissed a misdemeanor information in furtherance of justice, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in dismissing the information in furtherance of justice. Contrary to the People's assertions, the court fully considered all of the relevant factors set forth in CPL 170.40, and reached an individualized decision ( see People v. Rickert, 58 N.Y.2d 122, 126, 459 N.Y.S.2d 734, 446 N.E.2d 419 [1983];People v. Rivera, 108 A.D.3d 452, 969 N.Y.S.2d 55 [1st Dept.2013] ).

TOM, J.P., MAZZARELLI, FREEDMAN, RICHTER, FEINMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Velez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2013
111 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Velez

Case Details

Full title:The People of the STATE of New York, Appellant, v. Raymond VELEZ…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 14, 2013

Citations

111 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7574
974 N.Y.S.2d 784

Citing Cases

People v. Ndjie

Rather, the court is required to consider the factors enumerated in the statute in deciding whether…

People v. Edwards

Rather, the court is required to consider the factors enumerated in the statute in deciding whether…