From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vega

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 1992
181 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 31, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Ira R. Globerman, J., Angela Mazzarelli, J.


As the District Attorney concedes, a misapprehension by the sentencing court regarding its discretion pursuant to Penal Law § 70.25 (4) to impose a term concurrent to a sentence imposed by a court of another jurisdiction requires a resentencing of defendant (People v Jeffries, 166 A.D.2d 665, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 962).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Wallach, Asch, Smith and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Vega

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 1992
181 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Vega

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANGEL VEGA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
582 N.Y.S.2d 12

Citing Cases

People v. Yant

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice,…

People v. Marshall

Penal Law § 70.25 (4) provides, in relevant part, that "[w]hen a person, who is subject to any undischarged…