From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vedder

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 3, 1885
98 N.Y. 630 (N.Y. 1885)

Summary

In People v. Vedder (98 N.Y. 630, 632) our Court of Appeals clearly held: "It is quite clear that the woman spoken of in the statute is not regarded as one of the persons who could be guilty of the crime described in the 294th section [Now Penal Law, Section 80] and that she could not, therefore, be indicted under that section.

Summary of this case from People v. Lovell

Opinion

Argued January 19, 1885

Decided February 3, 1885

J.H. Clute for appellant.

D. Cady Herrick, district attorney, for respondent.



RUGER, Ch. J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Vedder

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 3, 1885
98 N.Y. 630 (N.Y. 1885)

In People v. Vedder (98 N.Y. 630, 632) our Court of Appeals clearly held: "It is quite clear that the woman spoken of in the statute is not regarded as one of the persons who could be guilty of the crime described in the 294th section [Now Penal Law, Section 80] and that she could not, therefore, be indicted under that section.

Summary of this case from People v. Lovell
Case details for

People v. Vedder

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . ALFRED F. VEDDER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 3, 1885

Citations

98 N.Y. 630 (N.Y. 1885)

Citing Cases

State v. Tennyson

Sections 10175 and 10176 make the offense of the abortionist distinct and separate from that of the woman;…

State v. Cragun

Obviously each of the two statutes above quoted defines a separate and distinct offense. It is quite clear…