From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vasquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 26, 2000
272 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 26, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered April 8, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Grace Vee, for respondent.

Stephen C. Filler, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Tom, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner, Andrias, Saxe, JJ.


Defendant's request for a missing witness charge with respect to a "ghost" officer was properly denied. Defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that this officer was in a position to observe defendant at any time (see, People v. Kitching, 78 N.Y.2d 532, 537, People v. Moultrie, 267 A.D.2d 181, 700 N.Y.S.2d 815). On the contrary, the evidence established that a testifying "ghost" officer was too far away to observe the portion of the drug transaction that involved defendant, and that the nontestifying officer was even farther away. The challenged portion of the prosecutor's summation was responsive to defendant's summation argument regarding the People's failure to call the witness (see, People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 134 lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 976) and did not suggest that the uncalled witness's testimony would have been incriminating.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Vasquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 26, 2000
272 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Vasquez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. VICTOR VASQUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 26, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
709 N.Y.S.2d 395

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Moreover, unlike the situation in Tankleff, it has not been demonstrated that the People's uncalled witness…

People v. Wigfall

The record, viewed as a whole, establishes that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v.…