From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vasquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 1993
190 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

February 23, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Phylis Bamberger, J.).


The comments made by the prosecutor during summation which defendant argues on appeal deprived him of a fair trial are not preserved for appellate review, no objection having been taken thereto at trial (CPL 470.05; People v Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641), and reversal is not warranted in the interest of justice. While some of the statements were improper (see, People v Torriente, 131 A.D.2d 793, 794-795), their cumulative effect was harmless in view of the overwhelming proof of guilt, including the complainant's positive identification and defendant's inculpatory post-arrest statement that he took the bag.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Vasquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 1993
190 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Vasquez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAVIER VASQUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 23, 1993

Citations

190 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Citing Cases

People v. Spaulding

Defendant's claims of prosecutorial misconduct are unpreserved for review either because he did not make…