From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vanderborg

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1950
95 N.E.2d 626 (N.Y. 1950)

Summary

In People v. Vanderborg (301 N.Y. 750) and People v. Ramistella (306 N.Y. 379, 385), this court held, at least in effect, that a conviction for larceny by false pretenses was not invalidated for failure to plead the false pretenses, when defendant failed to object to evidence of the representations.

Summary of this case from People v. Ercole

Opinion

Argued October 20, 1950

Decided November 22, 1950

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, FARRELL, J.

Charles Struckler and Kalman Kaplan for appellant.

Charles P. Sullivan, District Attorney ( Howard R. Lonergan of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Vanderborg

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1950
95 N.E.2d 626 (N.Y. 1950)

In People v. Vanderborg (301 N.Y. 750) and People v. Ramistella (306 N.Y. 379, 385), this court held, at least in effect, that a conviction for larceny by false pretenses was not invalidated for failure to plead the false pretenses, when defendant failed to object to evidence of the representations.

Summary of this case from People v. Ercole
Case details for

People v. Vanderborg

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALFRED HENRY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 22, 1950

Citations

95 N.E.2d 626 (N.Y. 1950)
95 N.E.2d 626

Citing Cases

People v. Rogers

The evidence erroneously admitted added little if any weight to evidence, amply sufficient to establish…

People v. Rivera

Under such circumstances, we believe the errors should be disregarded (cf. People v. Rogers, 21 A.D.2d 720;…