From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Van Florcke

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Apr 26, 1983
120 Misc. 2d 273 (N.Y. App. Term 1983)

Opinion

April 26, 1983

Appeal from the District Court of Nassau County JOHN F. O'SHAUGHNESSY, J.

Matthew Muraskin and Michael J. Obus for appellant.

Denis Dillon, District Attorney ( Herbert Esrick of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed, on the law, and matter remanded to the court below for further proceedings.

Although defendant was sentenced to a conditional discharge, she was charged with a violation for which a 15-day period of incarceration is authorized by statute (see Penal Law, § 240.25). Thus, it was incumbent upon the court to advise defendant that, if eligible, she would be entitled to assigned counsel (see CPL 170.10, subd 3, par [c]; County Law, art 18-B, §§ 722, 722-a; see, also, Matter of Davis v Shepard, 92 Misc.2d 181).

FARLEY, P.J., SLIFKIN and GEILER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Van Florcke

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Apr 26, 1983
120 Misc. 2d 273 (N.Y. App. Term 1983)
Case details for

People v. Van Florcke

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANN VAN FLORCKE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Apr 26, 1983

Citations

120 Misc. 2d 273 (N.Y. App. Term 1983)
467 N.Y.S.2d 298

Citing Cases

People v. Forbes

Term 9th 10th Jud. Dists.]; see also, People v. Warcup, 285 A.D. 1077 [2nd Dept. 1955]; People v Miller, 2…

People v. Forbes

10 (3) is reversible error (see, People v Johnson, NYLJ, July 15, 1996, at 25, col 5 [App Term, 9th & 10th…