From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Utsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1992
182 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 28, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.).


The evidence, including that of the threats defendant made to the complainant, was sufficient to permit the jury to exclude to a moral certainty any reasonable explanation other than that defendant ignited the fire (see, People v Hoppe, 89 A.D.2d 670, 671). A jury could reasonably infer that by leaving a burning trash bag against the door of the complainant's apartment, defendant intended that the building would be damaged by fire (see, People v Blum, 72 A.D.2d 691). We have considered defendant's other arguments, including that his sentence is excessive, and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Kupferman, Kassal and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Utsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1992
182 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Utsey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FREDDIE UTSEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Roche

Consequently, we reject defendant's related contention that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to…

People v. Dillard

We nonetheless conclude that defendant's contention is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most…