From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tyler

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jul 30, 2015
130 A.D.3d 1385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

106736

07-30-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mark H. TYLER, Appellant.

Richard V. Manning, Parishville, for appellant. Stuart M. Cohen, Special Prosecutor, Rensselaer, for respondent.


Richard V. Manning, Parishville, for appellant.

Stuart M. Cohen, Special Prosecutor, Rensselaer, for respondent.

Before: McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR., LYNCH and DEVINE, JJ.

Opinion

LYNCH, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, J.), rendered March 10, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of, among others, the crime of failure to register as a sex offender.

In 1997, after defendant was convicted of rape in the third degree (People v. Tyler, 260 A.D.2d 796, 690 N.Y.S.2d 136 [1999], lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 980, 695 N.Y.S.2d 67, 716 N.E.2d 1112 [1999] ), he was required to register as a sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art. 6–C). In 2013, he was indicted on one count of failing to register as a sex offender (see Correction Law §§ 168–f, 168–t ). Pursuant to a combined negotiated disposition, defendant pleaded guilty to the charge, admitted that he had previously been convicted for failure to register as a sex offender, and also pleaded guilty to certain charges contained in a separate six-count indictment charging him with criminal sale and possession of drugs. During the plea allocution, defendant was advised that an appeal waiver was part of the negotiated disposition and he signed a written appeal waiver in open court. Defendant now appeals from that part of the judgment related to his conviction for failing to register as sex offender.

In a separate appeal, defendant challenges his plea pertaining to the drug-related convictions (People v. Tyler, 130 A.D.3d 1383, 14 N.Y.S.3d 570, 2015 WL 4558722 [appeal No. 106719, decided herewith] ).

Defendant's sole contention on this appeal is that County Court should have assigned substitute counsel to represent him on his motion to withdraw his plea. For the reasons stated in People v. Tyler (130 A.D.3d 1383, 14 N.Y.S.3d 570, 2015 WL 4558722 [appeal No. 106719, decided herewith] ), we find that County Court was not required to assign new counsel to represent defendant prior to deciding the motion to withdraw the plea.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR. and DEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tyler

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jul 30, 2015
130 A.D.3d 1385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Tyler

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARK H. TYLER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 30, 2015

Citations

130 A.D.3d 1385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 6384
12 N.Y.S.3d 922

Citing Cases

People v. Tyler

Defendant now appeals from that part of the judgment pertaining to the drug-related convictions and we…